Sunday, October 28, 2012
Election Choices: Obama or Not?
We’re up against it now.
Less than two weeks left. Those
on the left confront their quadrennial quandary, and the inescapable debate: to
vote for the Democratic presidential nominee or not. “The lesser evil is still evil.” “Don’t make the perfect the enemy of the
good.” “The Supreme Court!” ‘Round and ‘round we go. It is a frustrating, enervating ritual, a
passionate argument between speakers who are not going to change each other’s
minds, but do hope to influence those who overhear. In other words, politics. Inescapable.
Labels:
Article-Post,
Election 2012,
Elections,
Obama
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
If Joe can embrace his Code Pink…
Yeah, I know what a creep Romney is, and I know a lot of folks are
fighting what they feel is the good fight against reactionary Republican
horseshit, often in hostile family, school, neighborhood, and work
environments. I certainly would like to
support and not demoralize them. I also know
our political and media universe is structured to make it seem that fighting
that fight requires one to support Obama.
Still, I am one of many who do not agree to be constrained within that
narrow paradigm, and think it’s important to recognize that it steers us into a
self-defeating race-to-the-bottom-right.
Labels:
Article-Post,
Drones,
War on Terror
Monday, October 22, 2012
No-Win Situation
Update below.
This Alternet article by Alex Kane, entitled, "5 Ways Romney and Obama Will Shamelessly Pander to Israel Tonight" is one of many reasons it would be hard for me to watch tonight's "foreign policy" debate without throwing up. Though, for sure, as the article says, "The Israeli leader will be pleased by watching this debate." The Israeli leader, that is, who boasted to a settler family of his ability to control America: "I know what America is. America is something that can easily be moved. Moved to the right direction.”
This is not OK. Not something we can pretend not to notice. Not something we have to be quiet about. It is destroying the world.
For this, and for many other reasons, there will be nothing to celebrate about the debate tonight, no matter which of the candidates, along with Israel, "wins."
Update:
Another question that will never be asked. Because heaven forbid Americans would actually ever be prompted to think such unavoidable thoughts.
(As tweeted by Glenn Greenwald)
Esquire's @TomJunod also proposes a question for President Obama tonight:
"Your administration has not just employed targeted killing; it has made the case for targeted killing to the rest of the world. What would you tell the leader of another country who wants to make use not only of technology pioneered by America but also of legal arguments pioneered by America? Do those arguments only count for America, or do they count also for Russia, China, and well, North Korea and Hezbollah?"
Links Cited:
Alex Kane, "5 Ways Romney and Obama Will Shamelessly Pander to Israel Tonight," http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/5-ways-romney-and-obama-will-shamelessly-pander-israel-tonight?paging=off
‘The world won’t say a thing’– Netanyahu on ongoing Israeli expansion,"
by Dena Shunra and Phil Weiss on July 17, 2010, http://mondoweiss.net/2010/07/the-world-wont-say-a-thing-netanyahu-on-ongoing-israeli-expansion.html
Tom Junod, "The Lethal Debate: Questions About Killing." http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/presidential-debate-drone-questions-13988897#ixzz2A4zsJGrB
This Alternet article by Alex Kane, entitled, "5 Ways Romney and Obama Will Shamelessly Pander to Israel Tonight" is one of many reasons it would be hard for me to watch tonight's "foreign policy" debate without throwing up. Though, for sure, as the article says, "The Israeli leader will be pleased by watching this debate." The Israeli leader, that is, who boasted to a settler family of his ability to control America: "I know what America is. America is something that can easily be moved. Moved to the right direction.”
This is not OK. Not something we can pretend not to notice. Not something we have to be quiet about. It is destroying the world.
For this, and for many other reasons, there will be nothing to celebrate about the debate tonight, no matter which of the candidates, along with Israel, "wins."
Update:
Another question that will never be asked. Because heaven forbid Americans would actually ever be prompted to think such unavoidable thoughts.
(As tweeted by Glenn Greenwald)
Esquire's @TomJunod also proposes a question for President Obama tonight:
"Your administration has not just employed targeted killing; it has made the case for targeted killing to the rest of the world. What would you tell the leader of another country who wants to make use not only of technology pioneered by America but also of legal arguments pioneered by America? Do those arguments only count for America, or do they count also for Russia, China, and well, North Korea and Hezbollah?"
Links Cited:
Alex Kane, "5 Ways Romney and Obama Will Shamelessly Pander to Israel Tonight," http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/5-ways-romney-and-obama-will-shamelessly-pander-israel-tonight?paging=off
‘The world won’t say a thing’– Netanyahu on ongoing Israeli expansion,"
by Dena Shunra and Phil Weiss on July 17, 2010, http://mondoweiss.net/2010/07/the-world-wont-say-a-thing-netanyahu-on-ongoing-israeli-expansion.html
Tom Junod, "The Lethal Debate: Questions About Killing." http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/presidential-debate-drone-questions-13988897#ixzz2A4zsJGrB
Labels:
Article-Post,
Palestine-Israel
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Act of Terrible
Update below.
Today, self-identified liberals and progressives are all a-twitter and high-fivin’ each other because in yesterday’s debate their guy “proved” that he actually and immediately did use, and does embrace, the term “act of terror” to describe the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi. Thus have Obama, and, following him, the bulk of the liberal caste, demonstrated their complete acceptance of the vapid, self-serving, hypocritical, obfuscatory, and dangerous language of “terror” as a touchstone of foreign policy credibility. That this has happened, and that nobody notices or cares that it has happened, is one of the more shameful facts about this debate, and the whole discourse of this sham campaign.
Today, self-identified liberals and progressives are all a-twitter and high-fivin’ each other because in yesterday’s debate their guy “proved” that he actually and immediately did use, and does embrace, the term “act of terror” to describe the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi. Thus have Obama, and, following him, the bulk of the liberal caste, demonstrated their complete acceptance of the vapid, self-serving, hypocritical, obfuscatory, and dangerous language of “terror” as a touchstone of foreign policy credibility. That this has happened, and that nobody notices or cares that it has happened, is one of the more shameful facts about this debate, and the whole discourse of this sham campaign.
Labels:
Article-Post,
Debates,
Election 2012,
Obama,
War on Terror
Saturday, October 13, 2012
Republican Arithmetrick
For all those who have been upset because I’ve been so mean
to the most powerful man in the world, and for all those whose “likes” of Mitt
Romney keep appearing on my Facebook page, it is worth taking a moment to emphasize
that no critique of Barack Obama and the Democratic party can or should be used
to suggest that it is acceptable to support Romney, Ryan, or the
Republicans.
Labels:
Article-Post,
Debates,
Republicans,
Romney
Support My Work
Featured Post From The Archive:
Can The World Abide Israel?
Can The World Abide Israel? Jim Kavanagh https://x.com/RamAbdu/status/1926666490893201875 There is no intellectually honest denial...