A further look at
the Ukraine debacle, in seven pieces.
Montagueski and Capuletovitch
(Cool Photo. Remember what happened to Romeo and Juliet.)
Ukraine,
Interrupted
“Ukraine”
means “borderland,”
and if there were ever a country suffering a borderline personality
disorder—barely “keeping itself together,” as we say—it is Ukraine. Suddenly,
it’s been deprived of its meds (discounted gas and other Russian-provided subsidies), and goaded into a schizophrenogenic
family crisis (the American-sponsored overthrow of its elected government,
resented by half the country). After the
maidan mania, came the Crimea
depression, and now, it seems, rapid and radical decompensation.
Before
the maidan winter games, if some in
the country (Kiev “liberals”) were looking for the cure from Dr. America and
Nurse NATO, standing by to treat the flailing patient with their straitjacket
of austerity and electroshock-and-awe therapy, perhaps some are now realizing
that these practitioners’ cures only increase the crazy.
Since
my last detailed post,
the Ukraine situation has indeed been devolving rapidly, both within the
country and on the level of international geopolitics. It’s hard to see where Ukraine is
going—whether it will survive as a unified state at all (even sans Crimea), and it is hard to see how
seriously the world will be riven by a “new Cold (or even hot) War.” American
political and media discourse is now completely dominated by the “aggressive
Russia/nasty Putin” meme, but it would be wise to look carefully at the
different axes of major, and lesser-included subsidiary, contradictions to see
the real web of tensions which the “new Cold War” narrative is designed to
occlude.
