 |
Kent State, 1970 14-year-old Mary Ann Vecchio, crying over the body of 20-year-old Jeffery Glenn Miller. Photo: John Filo |
As can be expected, in the aftermath of the horrific San
Bernardino mass murder committed by Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik in
December, the issue of “gun control” and “gun violence” comes to the fore
again, highlighted by a teary appeal from President Obama for new “gun safety”
measures. I’ve dealt with the issue of gun rights in a comprehensive
essay after a previous mass shooting (Sandy Hook), and I stand by the
position laid out therein.1
There are two considerations that, I think, count for something:
1) The right to own firearms is an important political
right. That is not a right-wing position. In fact, I consider the defense of
that right part of the populist tradition in left revolutionary politics. Therefore,
any necessary regulations on that right – and there will be some – must be as
carefully considered as the limitations on any other important right.
2) The American capitalist state is an apparatus whose
main purpose is to protect class rule and its accompanying injustices, and to project
compliance-inducing aggression on behalf of the American elite and its favored
allies — locally, nationally, and internationally. Any mitigations of these
injustices and aggressions are not the products of the liberal state’s inherent
neutrality and altruism. They are the hard-won, always-precarious, fruits of
social movements that scare the liberal capitalist state into forgoing
particular wars, advancing particular minority and civil rights, establishing
remunerative social welfare policies. etc.
In most “gun control” discourse, the first point — that gun
ownership is a fundamental political right — counts for less than nothing. Most
such discourse, in fact, considers it important that gun ownership not be considered a right, but some kind
of frivolous luxury. Those who think that should acknowledge it, and advocate
openly for the rescission and denial of that right, as do now the major organs
of mainstream liberal opinion in the United States, the Washington Post (“The
problem with Obama’s promise not to take away your guns”) and the New York Times (“it would require
Americans who own those kinds of weapons to give them up”). The strongest, most
forthright, statement of this position is given by Israeli-American sociologist
Amitai Etzioni in his Huffington Post column, “Needed:
Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'”.2